Tonight I read some more in Lois Lowry's The Giver. Jonas (the protagonist) has a weird thing happen to him sometimes: he's looking at something and it changes. That's the verb that's used, without further qualification: it "changes." Turns out what is happening is he is suddenly shifting into seeing in color (in the future society in which the book is set, people have been genetically rigged to be color-blind). Specifically, he's glimpsing the color red. This shift (and then back again) occurs when he views: an apple, the faces of an assembled audience from the vantage of the stage, a girl's hair.
The book is about the withholding of knowledge--for example, the knowledge of sex from children, the knowledge of death. It occurred to me originally that perhaps what Jonas saw (the "change" that flickered in his field of vision) was (since he is supposed to be gifted, a "seer") the warp of decay, the buckling in matter. Namely, that he had scouted out the presence (taboo) of death--like the poet. When I had this idea I felt an immense emotional charge, a shuddering in my body, a cold spell. I also had in my mind at the same time the bit of dialogue in Little Children, delivered by the old mother to the sex offender: "what makes us different from animals is that we know, we all know, that at any minute, the things we love, the people we love, can all be taken away from us...and yet we go on anyway..." Words to that effect. (And I also had in my mind, in this constellation of associated instances, Mark Ruffalo in a recent interview on Fresh Air talking about the removal of a benign brain tumor: how he wanted so badly to be good in In the Cut to prove to himself that he wasn't permanently debilitated, hadn't lost his touch--despite the cognitive dissociation he had felt in recovery.) On my misreading, that moment in The Giver (like the old mother's words in Little Children) heroizes our everyday facing of mortality; suddenly, we become heroic, our scale is magnified to the near-mythic. Thus the poet wishes to dwell on death to put his life in a heroic perspective, wishes to feel chosen--feels that the contemplation of death makes him special, and he feels charged with a mystical energy. Having these thoughts, I felt emotionally overwhelmed, could have shed tears: indeed, I felt my emotional need(iness) at the moment and the wanting to share with another person my emotional life, the existential excesses of my embodied presence--by, for instance, reading poetry aloud to them (instead of to my parrot).
I think a "message" of the film Little Children is the message voiced by the mother about living with the awareness that what we love, the people we love, at any moment, can all be taken away from us..." It is this formal awareness of brevity and fragility that Kate Winslet's character finally learns to adopt as a modus operandi of living. And this from a filmmaker whose previous film, "In the Bedroom," was about parents suffering the tragic loss of their child, a young man.
1 comment:
In addition, the line in the movie: Kate asks Patrick, when he says he feels (strangely) alive, now that their affair has commenced: "that's how you're supposed to feel." Patrick smiles nervously, as though he still feels a bit dubious about the whole notion of feeling alive. (He is guilty that he is hurting/betraying his wife and family.) I think the movie is implying that, no, that's NOT how you are supposed to feel. That's how America tries to make us think (and capitalism) we are supposed to feel: that is, selfishly entitled to happiness and fulfillment. The trajectory of the movie is to get Kate to understand that she must sacrifice her own romantic yearnings for the care of her child, which is a calling that is mundane and real. (Of course, whether parenthood is in truth a "sacrifice"--can you sacrifice TO the selfish gene--is a matter for further exploration. Certainly, it involves a shift in priorities on some level...)
Post a Comment